Login

"No party system is the ideal for all countries and in all situations."justify the statement with 5 arguments.

Party system is not something any country can choose.

It evolves over a long time, depending on the nature of society, its social and regional divisions, its history of politics and its system of elections.

These cannot be changed very quickly.

Each country develops a party system that is conditioned by its special circumstances.

For example, if India has evolved a multi-party system, it is because the social and geographical diversity in such a large country is not easily absorbed by two or even three parties.

No system is ideal for all countries and all situations.

  • 93
View Full Answer

Is this answer given in the text? If yes where? pl. tell me

  • -12

 ya, in page 77 last paragraph of ur politics text

  • 21

All countries are not the same in composition. Country like India has a diverse population. People of various religion, tribe, race, language reside here. Thus policies should be so framed that will fulfil the needs of all and will not give a upper hand to any one. On the other hand countries like Bangladesh where Islam is the most dominant religion and the major Ethnic group are the Bengalis, policy decisions will be aimed at other ends. Situations also change during periods of war and emergency. Adjustments and re-organisation of the government often needs to taken.

This conversation is already closed by Expert

  • 9
vineeta is right
  • -16
 Obviously party system is not something any country can choose.
It came to be created after along period of time,depending on the nature of the society,its social & regional divisions,its history of politics & its system of elections.
It not easy for them to be changed quickly.
Each & every country develops a party system that is conditioned by its special circumstances.i.e if India as evolved a multi-party system,it is because the social & geographical diversity in such a large country is not easily absorbed by two or even three parties.
No system is ideal for all countries & all situations.
  • 3
FOCAL LENGTH OF PLANE MIRROR
  • -19
Party is Not a thing that can be replaced
  • -18
All countries are not the same in composition. Country like India has a diverse population. People of various religion, tribe, race, language reside here. Thus policies should be so framed that will fulfil the needs of all and will not give a upper hand to any one. On the other hand countries like Bangladesh where Islam is the most dominant religion and the major Ethnic group are the Bengalis, policy decisions will be aimed at other ends. Situations also change during periods of war and emergency. Adjustments and re-organisation of the government often needs to taken.
  • 2
thfghfghf
  • -16
No Party system is ideal for all countries and all situations : 
(a) Party system is not something, any country can choose. 
(b) It evolves over a long time depending on the nature of the society. 
(c) Its social and regional division, its history of policies and its system of elections. 
(d) Each country develops a party system that is conditioned by its special circumstances.
  • 19
-Party system is not something any country can choose. -It evolves over a long time, depending on the nature of society, its social and regional divisions, its history of politics and its system of elections. -These cannot be changed very quickly. -Each country develops a party system that is conditioned by its special circumstances. -For example, if India has evolved a multi-party system, it is because the social and geographical diversity in such a large country is not easily absorbed by two or even three parties. -No system is ideal for all countries and all situations.
  • 5
NO PARTY SYSTEM IS IDEAL FOR ALL COUNTRIES AND ALL SITUATION : (i) Party system is not something any co try and people can choose . (ii) It evolves over a long time developing on the nature of the society it's social and religion divisions its histories of policies and its system of election . (iii) Each country develops a party system that is conditioned by its special circumstances.
  • 7
  • Party system is not something any country can choose.
  • It evolves over a period of time, depending on nature of society, its social and religious divisions, history of politics and system of elections.
  • This cannot be changed very quickly.
  • Each country develops a [arty system that is conditioned by its special circumstances.
  • EG: India has evolved as a multi-party system due to its social and geographical diversity.
  • 1
Party system is not something any country can choose it involves overa long time depending on the nature of society its social and regional division its history of politics and its system.of election these cannot be changed very quickly
  • 1

Party system is not something any country can choose.

It evolves over a long time, depending on the nature of society, its social and regional divisions, its history of politics and its system of elections.

These cannot be changed very quickly.

Each country develops a party system that is conditioned by its special circumstances.

For example, if India has evolved a multi-party system, it is because the social and geographical diversity in such a large country is not easily absorbed by two or even three parties

All countries are not the same in composition. Country like India has a diverse population. People of various religion, tribe, race, language reside here. Thus policies should be so framed that will fulfil the needs of all and will not give a upper hand to any one. On the other hand countries like Bangladesh where Islam is the most dominant religion and the major Ethnic group are the Bengalis, policy decisions will be aimed at other ends. Situations also change during periods of war and emergency. Adjustments and re-organisation of the government often needs to taken.

  • 3
What are you looking for?