"The constituent assembly instituted several provisions in the constitution that would establish the rule of law". Was such the case in ancient India too? Elaborate giving 3 reasons
Dear Students,
The individual from the constituent get together had battled for freedom from British standard in light of its discretionary principles. They were made to comply with rules which product cruel, severe and they had no job in the creation of. For this, they supported the foundation of law and order in free India. Law and order exists when a state's constitution capacities as the incomparable tradition that must be adhered to, when the rules established and authorized by the public authority perpetually adjust to the constitution. For instance, the second statement of Article VI of the U.S. Constitution says: laws are upheld similarly and fairly.
Sketchy accepted that there were two standards which were innate in the non-classified British constitution. The first and essential rule was the "sway or matchless quality of Parliament". The subsequent standard, which tempered the first, was "law and order".
Regards.
The individual from the constituent get together had battled for freedom from British standard in light of its discretionary principles. They were made to comply with rules which product cruel, severe and they had no job in the creation of. For this, they supported the foundation of law and order in free India. Law and order exists when a state's constitution capacities as the incomparable tradition that must be adhered to, when the rules established and authorized by the public authority perpetually adjust to the constitution. For instance, the second statement of Article VI of the U.S. Constitution says: laws are upheld similarly and fairly.
Sketchy accepted that there were two standards which were innate in the non-classified British constitution. The first and essential rule was the "sway or matchless quality of Parliament". The subsequent standard, which tempered the first, was "law and order".
Regards.